14 January 2016
Last week, the European Commission visited the Netherlands for a series of meetings at the opening of the Dutch EU Presidency that covers the first half of 2016. An opening ceremony, including the taking of the traditional group photo, took place at Amsterdam’s stately Museum of Maritime History.
This official reception however appears to have been a rare public occasion during the Commission’s stay in the Netherlands.
Dutch daily newspaper NRC Handelsblad reported that the debate between the Dutch States-General (combining both the lower and the upper houses of parliament) and the European Commission was to take place behind closed doors.
According to NRC Handelsblad, spokespersons of the parliament argue that this will allow for a more truthful and open exchange of views. This is remarkable, the paper points out, as the meeting was set to be a debate rather than a negotiation. It concludes:
It may be considered hilarious that the European Commission, which is often dismissed in the Netherlands as a bureaucratic monster, holds a democratic mirror in the face of the Dutch parliament. But above all, it is a disgrace for the parliament.
In line with convention, the Dutch presidency has also opened its own presidency website. This website contains a detailed agenda of meetings over the coming half year and a document register searchable by date and by key words. At the time of writing, the register contained 16 documents. Among these was a presidency programme of priorities. This programme referred 12 times to the terms “transparency”, “transparent” and “open”, in contexts as diverse as European decision making, finance, defence, and the rule of law. Earlier this year, the Netherlands backed a plan launched by a number of member states to reinvigorate the transparency of Council decision making, igniting hopes of progress among transparency advocates. With the closed-door session however, the Netherlands, traditionally a transparency-friendly country, seems to have started off on the wrong foot. It remains to be seen whether the Dutch government will prove more willing than its parliament to promote transparent European deliberation.
This piece was previously published on the Open Government in the EU blog. Minor adjustments have been made to reflect changes during the past week.
Maarten Hillebrandt is a PhD Researcher at the Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance.